With 300: Rise of an Empire expected to hit theaters in 2014, a curiosity has been building over the first 300 movie. The first 300 film was released in 2006 and
was adapted to the screen by Zack Snyder from Frank Miller's graphic novel. The
story depicts the fight of 300 Spartans to repel a much larger Persian invading
army from Greece. While the film is appealing to me on a superficial aesthetic
level I find the story and how it is represented to be extremely problematic.
First there is the issue of all the historical inconsistencies in the film (which pain me). Secondly there is the issue of the film as extreme propaganda dressed up in the guise of an action film and historical drama. The film is clearly pro-war, ethnocentric, racist propaganda which also has tones of homophobia and prejudice towards people with disabilities. These issues coupled with the film's use of "black face" for Xerxes (the main villain) make 300 comparative to films such as "Birth of a Nation". Although I would like to think that 300 was accidentally made into a hegemonic monument, the extreme message of the film and the background of the director lead to me to believe that it was done purposefully.
First there is the issue of all the historical inconsistencies in the film (which pain me). Secondly there is the issue of the film as extreme propaganda dressed up in the guise of an action film and historical drama. The film is clearly pro-war, ethnocentric, racist propaganda which also has tones of homophobia and prejudice towards people with disabilities. These issues coupled with the film's use of "black face" for Xerxes (the main villain) make 300 comparative to films such as "Birth of a Nation". Although I would like to think that 300 was accidentally made into a hegemonic monument, the extreme message of the film and the background of the director lead to me to believe that it was done purposefully.
Pro-War
Propaganda
The
film 300 is pro-war propaganda on two different levels. First it is Propaganda within
in the world and time that the story takes place. The story of 300 is being
told by the soldier and poet Diliois who has been sent by Leonidas to tell the
tale and inspire the Spartan armies to fight in their memory. The intent of Dilios’
story is shown in one of his final lines when he says " 'Remember us.' As
simple an order as a king can give. “Remember why we died…Go tell the Spartans,
passerby, that here by Spartan law, we lie.” While the story is presented to audience in the film as
historical fact it is actually an epideictic portrait, that is a story that is
meant to teach the audience on the virtues of a person and their life. Epideictic
rhetoric is one of the three major branches of rhetoric that was described by
Aristotle and was often used for funeral orations, obituaries, etc. Looking at
the story in this context it can be seen as hegemonic propaganda meant to
inspire the Spartan army to fight.
The
Entire film itself is meant to be pro-war propaganda for a modern audience as
well. Parallels can be drawn between the events in the movie and the very real
war being fought at the time in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Greeks can be seen to
represent the U.S and other western countries, The Persians can be seen as to
represent the Middle East and even the "threat" of Muslim religion. The
fight is seemingly provoked by aggression from the Persians who wish to take
the Greeks freedom and who will commit atrocities such as completely decimating
an entire city and its inhabitants. At one point Queen Gorgo says that
"Freedom isn't free at all" which is a statement mirroring that used
is the U.S as a slogan for the reasons needed for going to war, "Freedom
isn't Free".
Ethnocentrism
and Racism
There
is the use of "Black Face" and "White Washing" in this film
which is difficult to ignore. Blackface has a long history in theatre and film.
Traditionally Caucasian actors would paint their face black (using burnt cork,
grease paint, or shoe polish) and present a caricature of a Black person. "Whitewashing"
is a term used to describe the act of taking an ethnic character such as an
Asian person Native American person, or Hispanic person and instead of having a
person of that ethnicity play the character, a white person is cast to play
that ethnic role. Jake Gyllenhaal in the Prince of Persia is a recent example
of whitewashing. Arguably Jennifer Lawrence playing Katniss Everdeen is another
example of Hollywood whitewashing an ethnic character. In the history of
theatre and film Black Face and Whitewashing have been visual manifestations of
racism. The film 300 can be viewed as either being guilty of both using Black
Face and White Washing. The character of Xerxes was played by Rodrigo Santoro a
Brazilian actor who is several shades lighter than the "Xerxes" shown
in the film. I would ask what was the purpose of making Xerxes so dark skinned
and if it was a necessary quality of the character, why could somebody who
naturally posses that skin tone have been chosen.
While
celebrating western hegemony the film also condemns eastern hegemony and exalts
western culture. Ethnocentrism is shown in the ways that western and eastern
cultures are depicted. The Western Greeks are hardworking, freedom respecting,
and somewhat democratic. The Eastern Persians are depicted as indulgent, slave
owning (or as slaves), threatening mysticism, and tyrannical. While the
Spartans are depicted as more human with families and people they care about as
part of their motivation for fighting, the Persians are one dimensional
characters who seem to be fighting out of pure greed and the need to have the entire
world submit to their God (God-King) and culture. Eastern Culture is depicted
as dangerous as it is used in all it lavishness and false promises to seduce
characters into betraying their country. The Greeks are portrayed as humans
while the Persians are portrayed as monsters. The Immortals are never given
actual human faces but are only shown in terms of their monster-like masks,
Xerxes is ghoulish, and many of his servants who are not shown as outright
monsters are shown as grotesque at the very least. So not only are people of
color the enemy in this film, but they are also demonized and de-humanized. We
are never meant to sympathize with them or view them as actual people, and by
dehumanizing them the violent actions of the Spartans are never called into
questions because the audience is never allowed to become emotionally attached
to the Persian characters. Xerxes who called the "God-King" is shown to
be a character very comparable to the Devil as he seduces people into betraying
their country by playing on their greed and lust, he is the "Foreign
Devil".
Homophobia
Homophobia
also seems to be pandered to in the film. While it has been argued by others
that the film is homoerotic due to the main characters being attractive and
muscular men who spend a majority of the time half naked and in male only
society, the film actually seems to be against homosexuality. The muscular and
loin-cloth clad Spartans are not meant to be homoerotic but instead are supposed
to represent the ideal of masculinity. They are the ultra-buff action heroes of
their (and our) day. They are meant to be masculinity at its perfection and to
cut a contrast to the indulgent and effeminate Persians. Within the first few
minutes of the film Leonidas takes a jab at the Athenians by calling them "boy-lovers" which in the
context of the film is meant to be derogatory. Xerxes is then depicted as a
bejeweled , long nailed, and effeminate character who is a sticking contrast to
"real men" like the Spartans. The director himself said that this was
done on purpose because "What’s more scary to
a 20-year-old boy than a giant god-king who wants to have his way with
you?" (Belonsky, 2007)
Conclusion
The
film 300 has a clear hegemonic view. It is also a film that throws support to war and specifically
the war in Iraq and Afghanistan by drawing parallels between the "Western culture
and Eastern Culture" conflict during the time period of the story and in
recent years. Wars and violence are glorified, dissenters are traitors, and
being a good citizen is defined as being willing to give your life for the
state without question.
What do you think? In your opinion, is this film analysis of 300 accurate? Let us know in the comment section below.
GUEST BLOGGER INFO
Contributing writer: Rainbow S. Coan
Rainbow Coan is a Sci-fi and fantasy movie/T.V enthusiast and all around nerd. Her hobbies include playing StarCraft II (mainly as Terran), reading Sci-fi & fantasy books, and playing games on Xbox. She has a Zombie Apocalypse survival plan and identifies strongly with Hobbits. Her favorite game of all time is King's Quest 6.
No comments:
Post a Comment